|
|
| The power rating system is based on recent game results. The section should be used to compare the relative strength of the two teams involved. A power line is calculated using both teams ratings and home field advantage. Where the power line differs significantly from the current line, the team with the edge is indicated. |
|---|
|
|
|
| All team trends listed below apply to the current game. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| in games where the line is +3 to -3 | 2-1 | 10-8 | 48-40 | 3-0 | 12-6 | 40-52 | 1-2 | 9-9 | 49-42 | | in all games | 5-2 | 22-20 | 120-98 | 4-3 | 25-16 | 104-118 | 4-3 | 22-20 | 118-107 | | in all lined games | 5-2 | 22-20 | 120-98 | 4-3 | 25-16 | 104-118 | 4-3 | 22-20 | 118-107 | | as a favorite | 3-1 | 11-9 | 60-45 | 1-3 | 8-11 | 51-55 | 3-1 | 14-6 | 78-30 | | as a road favorite of 3 points or less | 0-0 | 0-2 | 7-7 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 7-8 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 8-7 | | in road games | 2-1 | 10-12 | 57-55 | 3-0 | 15-6 | 49-63 | 1-2 | 9-13 | 46-68 | | in road lined games | 2-1 | 10-12 | 57-55 | 3-0 | 15-6 | 49-63 | 1-2 | 9-13 | 46-68 | | in a road game where the total is between 42.5 and 45 points | 0-1 | 1-1 | 7-6 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 8-5 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 5-9 | | in all games where the total is between 42.5 and 49 points | 2-1 | 4-3 | 20-18 | 2-1 | 5-2 | 21-18 | 1-2 | 2-5 | 13-27 | | against conference opponents | 4-2 | 17-16 | 93-75 | 3-3 | 20-12 | 81-90 | 4-2 | 16-17 | 89-85 | | when playing with 6 or less days rest | 3-2 | 15-17 | 94-81 | 3-2 | 18-13 | 86-93 | 2-3 | 17-15 | 97-85 | | versus division opponents | 1-1 | 7-8 | 52-45 | 0-2 | 9-5 | 55-44 | 1-1 | 6-9 | 50-51 | | in games played on turf | 1-1 | 3-4 | 16-16 | 2-0 | 5-2 | 15-17 | 0-2 | 2-5 | 11-21 | | in November games | 1-0 | 5-5 | 31-23 | 0-1 | 8-2 | 33-25 | 1-0 | 5-5 | 30-27 | | revenging a loss against opponent | 0-0 | 5-7 | 29-31 | 0-0 | 7-5 | 35-28 | 0-0 | 5-7 | 26-37 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-2 | 9-10 | 45-41 | 2-2 | 11-8 | 41-48 | 1-3 | 7-12 | 31-59 | | in weeks 5 through 9 | 2-1 | 6-6 | 30-29 | 1-2 | 5-7 | 27-34 | 1-2 | 6-6 | 26-35 |
|
|
|
|
| in games where the line is +3 to -3 | 2-0 | 9-6 | 45-45 | 2-0 | 7-9 | 49-43 | 2-0 | 9-7 | 47-47 | | in all games | 4-3 | 17-21 | 127-148 | 4-3 | 16-22 | 137-138 | 5-2 | 16-22 | 103-176 | | in all lined games | 4-3 | 17-21 | 127-148 | 4-3 | 16-22 | 137-138 | 5-2 | 16-22 | 103-176 | | as an underdog | 4-0 | 12-10 | 90-110 | 3-1 | 8-14 | 102-98 | 4-0 | 9-13 | 53-149 | | as a home underdog of 3 points or less | 2-0 | 3-1 | 14-19 | 2-0 | 2-2 | 19-14 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 14-19 | | in home games | 2-2 | 10-10 | 62-77 | 2-2 | 7-12 | 74-64 | 2-2 | 10-9 | 63-77 | | in home lined games | 2-2 | 10-10 | 62-77 | 2-2 | 7-12 | 74-64 | 2-2 | 10-9 | 63-77 | | in a home game where the total is between 42.5 and 45 points | 1-0 | 2-0 | 15-16 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 14-18 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 16-16 | | in all games where the total is between 42.5 and 49 points | 1-1 | 8-9 | 46-53 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 43-58 | 1-1 | 7-11 | 39-62 | | against conference opponents | 2-3 | 11-18 | 91-120 | 2-3 | 11-17 | 105-103 | 3-2 | 12-17 | 72-141 | | when playing with 2 weeks or more of rest | 0-0 | 1-0 | 7-9 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 9-7 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 3-12 | | versus division opponents | 2-1 | 6-9 | 50-75 | 2-1 | 7-8 | 65-60 | 3-0 | 7-8 | 46-80 | | after a bye week | 0-0 | 1-1 | 8-10 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 10-8 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 4-13 | | in games played on turf | 2-2 | 11-12 | 74-81 | 2-2 | 9-13 | 78-75 | 2-2 | 10-12 | 63-93 | | in November games | 0-0 | 4-4 | 41-30 | 0-0 | 4-3 | 38-31 | 0-0 | 3-4 | 30-40 | | when playing against a team with a winning record | 2-0 | 7-7 | 49-54 | 1-1 | 5-9 | 54-51 | 2-0 | 5-8 | 28-76 | | in weeks 5 through 9 | 2-1 | 5-7 | 32-41 | 1-2 | 6-5 | 39-35 | 2-1 | 4-8 | 22-54 |
|
|
|
| Peformance statistics for each team in various situations are listed below. Categories where a team has performed poorly are denoted in red. Categories where a team has performed well are denoted in green. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 4-3 | -2 | 5-2 | 4-3 | 28.4 | 10.6 | 378.7 | (6) | 1.0 | 19.6 | 8.1 | 313.7 | (5.5) | 1.4 | | Road Games | 1-2 | -1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 27.7 | 10.3 | 374.0 | (6.1) | 1.0 | 28.7 | 15.7 | 406.3 | (6.5) | 1.0 | | Last 3 Games | 1-2 | -4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 25.0 | 5.3 | 332.3 | (5.9) | 0.7 | 19.0 | 5.7 | 343.0 | (5.7) | 1.0 | | Turf Games | 0-1 | -1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 21.0 | 7.0 | 363.0 | (5.7) | 2.0 | 27.0 | 17.0 | 319.0 | (5.1) | 1.0 | | Division Games | 1-1 | -3 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 24.0 | 13.5 | 368.0 | (6.5) | 1.5 | 10.0 | 1.5 | 294.5 | (5.1) | 3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 28.4 | 10.6 | 22.0 | 29:55 | 27-125 | (4.6) | 24-36 | 66.0% | 254 | (7) | 63-379 | (6) | (13.3) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 20.3 | 10.1 | 18.3 | 30:02 | 27-116 | (4.2) | 20-32 | 60.4% | 217 | (6.7) | 60-333 | (5.6) | (16.4) | | Offense Road Games | 27.7 | 10.3 | 22.0 | 26:21 | 22-109 | (4.9) | 24-39 | 62.4% | 265 | (6.8) | 61-374 | (6.1) | (13.5) | | Defense (All Games) | 19.6 | 8.1 | 17.9 | 30:05 | 25-88 | (3.5) | 20-32 | 62.7% | 226 | (7) | 57-314 | (5.5) | (16) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 21.9 | 10.8 | 18.6 | 31:52 | 28-109 | (3.9) | 20-33 | 61.0% | 216 | (6.5) | 61-325 | (5.3) | (14.8) | | Defense Road Games | 28.7 | 15.7 | 21.3 | 33:39 | 27-102 | (3.7) | 22-35 | 63.2% | 305 | (8.6) | 63-406 | (6.5) | (14.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 14-7 | 48.4% | 1-0 | 40.0% | 4-106 | (26.4) | 2-9 | (4.3) | 8-64 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 13-5 | 38.3% | 1-0 | 46.9% | 4-92 | (23) | 20-2 | (9.4) | 7-47 | | Stats For (Road Games) | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 13-6 | 47.4% | 1-0 | 0.0% | 6-145 | (24.2) | 1-3 | (2.5) | 6-64 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.4 | | 13-4 | 33.0% | 1-1 | 71.4% | 5-108 | (20.9) | 2-15 | (7) | 6-47 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 0.9 | 0.6 | 1.5 | | 14-5 | 37.2% | 1-1 | 55.4% | 4-93 | (23.8) | 27-2 | (11.2) | 6-64 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.0 | | 13-5 | 40.0% | 1-1 | 66.7% | 5-102 | (21.9) | 2-16 | (6.9) | 7-47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All Games | 5-2 | +5.7 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 23.3 | 12.7 | 345.9 | (5.6) | 1.6 | 18.3 | 9.7 | 341.3 | (5.7) | 1.7 | | Home Games | 2-2 | -1.2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 23.0 | 12.7 | 331.0 | (5.6) | 1.2 | 17.5 | 8.2 | 356.5 | (6.2) | 1.7 | | Last 3 Games | 2-1 | +2.4 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 26.3 | 17.0 | 382.3 | (6.2) | 1.7 | 17.3 | 8.0 | 336.0 | (5.9) | 2.7 | | Turf Games | 2-2 | -1.2 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 23.0 | 12.7 | 331.0 | (5.6) | 1.2 | 17.5 | 8.2 | 356.5 | (6.2) | 1.7 | | Division Games | 3-0 | +5.3 | 2-1 | 2-1 | 21.0 | 6.7 | 350.3 | (5.4) | 1.3 | 18.0 | 9.0 | 341.7 | (5.4) | 1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Offense (All Games) | 23.3 | 12.7 | 20.1 | 31:51 | 29-128 | (4.3) | 20-32 | 61.7% | 218 | (6.7) | 62-346 | (5.6) | (14.9) | | Opponents Defensive Avg. | 19.9 | 10.7 | 18.1 | 30:45 | 27-106 | (4) | 20-32 | 60.2% | 208 | (6.4) | 59-314 | (5.3) | (15.8) | | Offense Home Games | 23.0 | 12.7 | 19.7 | 29:43 | 27-112 | (4.1) | 21-32 | 65.1% | 219 | (6.8) | 59-331 | (5.6) | (14.4) | | Defense (All Games) | 18.3 | 9.7 | 17.7 | 30:17 | 23-88 | (3.8) | 23-37 | 63.7% | 253 | (6.9) | 59-341 | (5.7) | (18.7) | | Opponents Offensive Avg. | 22.3 | 10.9 | 19.1 | 31:43 | 27-108 | (4) | 21-33 | 63.7% | 234 | (7) | 60-342 | (5.7) | (15.3) | | Defense Home Games | 17.5 | 8.2 | 17.0 | 30:17 | 23-75 | (3.3) | 23-34 | 68.1% | 282 | (8.2) | 57-356 | (6.2) | (20.4) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stats For (All Games) | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 14-6 | 41.7% | 1-1 | 80.0% | 4-74 | (20) | 2-32 | (13.1) | 6-30 | | Opponents Avg. Stats Against | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 2 | 13-5 | 37.4% | 1-1 | 48.3% | 4-96 | (23.2) | 19-2 | (8.8) | 6-48 | | Stats For (Home Games) | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 13-5 | 41.2% | 1-1 | 66.7% | 3-68 | (19.4) | 1-16 | (11) | 4-30 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.7 | | 13-5 | 39.6% | 1-0 | 50.0% | 4-93 | (23.3) | 2-26 | (11.6) | 7-48 | | Opponents Avg. Stats For | 1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | | 13-5 | 39.3% | 1-0 | 44.7% | 4-95 | (24.6) | 25-2 | (10) | 6-30 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.7 | | 12-5 | 43.7% | 1-0 | 50.0% | 4-84 | (20.9) | 2-16 | (8) | 6-48 |
|
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: BALTIMORE 21, CINCINNATI 21.6 |
|
|
| Here are the most recent results and upcoming schedules for the two teams involved. Lines, total, game scores, results versus the spread, straight up and against the total are all displayed. |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9/13/2009 | DENVER | 7-12 | L | -5 | L | 41 | U | 27-86 | 21-33-221 | 2 | 20-75 | 17-28-227 | 0 | | 9/20/2009 | @ GREEN BAY | 31-24 | W | 9 | W | 41.5 | O | 34-151 | 15-23-168 | 2 | 18-89 | 21-39-222 | 1 | | 9/27/2009 | PITTSBURGH | 23-20 | W | 3 | W | 36.5 | O | 19-100 | 20-37-173 | 0 | 28-102 | 22-31-271 | 1 | | 10/4/2009 | @ CLEVELAND | 23-20 | W | -6 | L | 37.5 | O | 30-154 | 23-44-221 | 2 | 33-146 | 26-48-249 | 2 | | 10/11/2009 | @ BALTIMORE | 17-14 | W | 9 | W | 42 | U | 34-142 | 18-31-261 | 2 | 18-82 | 22-31-175 | 2 | | 10/18/2009 | HOUSTON | 17-28 | L | -3.5 | L | 46 | U | 17-46 | 23-35-250 | 3 | 31-87 | 28-40-385 | 2 | | 10/25/2009 | CHICAGO | 45-10 | W | 1.5 | W | 42.5 | O | 45-215 | 20-24-233 | 0 | 12-35 | 27-39-244 | 4 | | 11/8/2009 | BALTIMORE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/15/2009 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/22/2009 | @ OAKLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/29/2009 | CLEVELAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/6/2009 | DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| Listed below is a summary of the games results in recent Head-to-Head matchups. |
|---|
|
|
| BALTIMORE is 15-12 against the spread versus CINCINNATI since 1992 | | BALTIMORE is 15-12 straight up against CINCINNATI since 1992 | | 15 of 27 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| CINCINNATI is 3-2 against the spread versus BALTIMORE over the last 3 seasons | | CINCINNATI is 3-2 straight up against BALTIMORE over the last 3 seasons | | 3 of 5 games in this series have gone UNDER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
| CINCINNATI is 7-6 against the spread versus BALTIMORE since 1992 | | CINCINNATI is 7-6 straight up against BALTIMORE since 1992 | | 7 of 13 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL since 1992 |
| |
| CINCINNATI is 1-1 against the spread versus BALTIMORE over the last 3 seasons | | CINCINNATI is 1-1 straight up against BALTIMORE over the last 3 seasons | | 2 of 2 games in this series have gone OVER THE TOTAL over the last 3 seasons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10/11/2009 | CINCINNATI | 17 | 42 | SU ATS | 3 | 22 | 34:19 | 34-142 | 18-31 | 261 | 1 | 1 | 7-39 | | | BALTIMORE | 14 | -9 | Under | 7 | 12 | 25:41 | 18-82 | 22-31 | 175 | 0 | 2 | 10-76 | | 11/30/2008 | BALTIMORE | 34 | -7 | SU ATS | 13 | 20 | 37:51 | 43-147 | 20-30 | 304 | 0 | 0 | 3-30 | | | CINCINNATI | 3 | 36 | Over | 3 | 6 | 21:02 | 16-57 | 12-33 | 98 | 0 | 1 | 3-15 | | 9/7/2008 | CINCINNATI | 10 | -2 | Under | 3 | 8 | 23:45 | 23-65 | 10-25 | 89 | 1 | 1 | 5-40 | | | BALTIMORE | 17 | 38 | SU ATS | 10 | 21 | 36:15 | 46-229 | 15-29 | 129 | 2 | 0 | 9-64 | | 11/11/2007 | CINCINNATI | 21 | 44 | SU ATS | 6 | 17 | 35:42 | 34-70 | 23-34 | 256 | 0 | 0 | 7-45 | | | BALTIMORE | 7 | -3 | Under | 0 | 16 | 24:18 | 18-66 | 23-34 | 206 | 4 | 2 | 6-30 | | 9/10/2007 | BALTIMORE | 20 | 39.5 | Over | 10 | 20 | 32:21 | 25-107 | 22-40 | 207 | 4 | 2 | 10-86 | | | CINCINNATI | 27 | -2.5 | SU ATS | 12 | 13 | 27:39 | 23-55 | 20-32 | 181 | 2 | 0 | 5-41 |
|
|
|
| Oddsmakers move a line in part because of one-sided public betting action on a side or total. They also move the line in reaction to wise guys selections. Either way, this section attempts to uncover whether the wise guys and public have a read on a given team. It summarizes both line and total movements. As a general rule, follow the line or total movement when percentages exceed 57% and go against it when they are below 43%. |
|---|
|
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BALTIMORE games 48% of the time since 1992. (82-89) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in BALTIMORE games 52.8% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-17) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CINCINNATI games 51.5% of the time since 1992. (104-98) | | The betting public is correct when moving the money line in CINCINNATI games 54.3% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-16) | |
|
| The betting public is correct when moving the total in BALTIMORE games 55.9% of the time since 1992. (100-79) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in BALTIMORE games 44.7% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (17-21) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CINCINNATI games 49.3% of the time since 1992. (113-116) | | The betting public is correct when moving the total in CINCINNATI games 57.6% of the time over the past 3 seasons. (19-14) | |
|
|
|
|
| [OT] 08/04/2009 - Adam Terry IR ( Knee ) | | [CB] 10/19/2009 - Samari Rolle IR ( Neck ) | | [WR] 08/14/2009 - Marcus Smith IR ( ACL ) | | [DL] 08/15/2009 - Lamar Divens IR ( Hip ) | | [LB] 09/06/2009 - Jason Phillips IR ( Knee ) | | [LB] 10/05/2009 - Brendon Ayanbadejo IR ( Quad ) | | [DL] 11/01/2009 - Haloti Ngata injured last game, "?" Sunday vs. Cincinnati ( Ankle ) | | [LS] 11/06/2009 - Matt Katula "?" Sunday vs. Cincinnati ( Elbow ) | |
| [TE] 08/03/2009 - Reggie Kelly IR ( Achilles ) | | [OT] 11/01/2009 - Andre Smith is upgraded to probable Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Foot ) | | [WR] 09/06/2009 - Antonio Chatman IR ( Ankle ) | | [TE] 08/31/2009 - Ben Utecht IR ( Concussion ) | | [C] 08/24/2009 - Dan Santucci IR ( Foot ) | | [fb] 11/03/2009 - Jeremi Johnson is upgraded to probable Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Knee ) | | [S] 11/01/2009 - Roy L Williams is upgraded to probable Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Forearm ) | | [rb] 11/04/2009 - Bernard Scott is upgraded to probable Sunday vs. Baltimore ( Knee ) | | [DE] 10/20/2009 - Antwan Odom IR ( Achilles ) |
|
|